Responses to some questions from Uplands residents on the Socialist Party and why I'm a socialist. Ronnie Job
Q: In a time where more and more people are asking for social and economic justice from their politicians and government, why do you think socialism is still one of the least followed political causes?
A: I don’t agree that socialism doesn’t have much of a following. The crisis of the capitalist markets has shaken the belief of lots of people in the future for themselves and their children. This is the first generation in Britain that expects to have a lower standard of living than their parents. The subsequent questioning has been behind our successes in Ireland where we now have 3 TDs (MPs). Everywhere people are looking around for an alternative way of organising society. Even in the belly of the capitalist beast (the USA) socialism is on the march. The election of Socialist Alternative (co-thinkers of the Socialist Party in the States) Council member, Kshama Sawant in Seattle, with over 93,000 votes has sent shock waves across America. The biggest obstacle perhaps to people calling themselves socialist in Britain/Europe is the existence of so-called Labour or Socialist parties whose claims to be socialist while inflicting huge cuts and creating confusion. But where a clear and relevant socialist programme is put across it gets an echo and support, which although not necessarily translated into votes everywhere at this stage, gives socialists reason to be confident for the future.
Q: Socialists are renowned for having incredibly strong membership cores, much more so than more popular, main stream organisations. All of your members directly involved in real activism all the time, and no other party has that; Why do you think this is, and how do you do it?
A: There are a couple of things that are relevant. Firstly there is the confidence in our ideas. Socialist Party members constantly debate and discuss and test our ideas in the trade unions, in elections, in our communities, refining them until we are confident in their correctness. Then we are not professional politicians after a career or playing at politics. We are just ordinary people who want to see a better life for our children, our workmates, communities and class. We have a principled position of being workers’ representatives on a workers’ wage. We think it’s important that workers’ representatives do not become divorced from the people they represent by taking home inflated salaries. Even at a local council level, I think it’s ridiculous that councillors get a basic allowance of £13,000+ (more than some of my union members earn for full-time jobs). If elected, I would take only genuine expenses, donating the rest to campaigns and the movement. There are no lucrative careers to be had in the Socialist Party so we don’t get flighty careerists.
Q: How do you believe the Socialist Party can take their grassroots activities to a national stage to compete with major political parties? What benefit does forming a coalition with the Trade Unions provide you and the Socialist Party locally?
A: The Socialist Party has played and will continue to play a pivotal part on a national and international stage but we are about much more than elections. In the past, when we were the Militant Tendency, we had 3 Labour MPs, we were a leading part in the battle of Liverpool Council with Thatcher’s government, where we translated socialism into the language of 5,000 new homes, community centres, nurseries and sports centres, resulting in the creation of thousands of jobs. Militant provided the political leadership of the anti-poll tax movement which brought down Thatcher.
We participate in the National Shop Stewards Network a rank and file movement of trade union activists. The Trade Unionist & Socialist Coalition (TUSC) is an alliance with the RMT trade union (which is officially affiliated to TUSC), other individual trade unionists, various left groups, anti-cuts campaigners and individuals who just want to fight back. TUSC is a coalition, united around a basic programme which all its members can agree on, based on trade union principles of socialism and solidarity. Decisions at a local and national scale are taken by consensus.
The Socialist Party takes part in TUSC because by coming together we have an opportunity to present the socialist, no-cuts alternative to as wide an audience as possible. In the council elections in England last year, TUSC provided the biggest ever left challenge to Labour. In May, we aim to stand 100 parliamentary candidates, including Swansea West and 1,000 council candidates in England. Not bad for an organisation that has only been in existence for 4 years!
Q: You’re really pushing the Anti-cuts message; to locals out there who don’t know Socialist policy, what do you hope to achieve on a local level aside from fighting cuts? What will a vote for you and TUSC do for the ward, the city and the TUSC cause?
We talk a lot about fighting cuts because cuts to services pose such a threat to the quality of ordinary people’s lives. Cuts to the NHS threaten the health of our communities, cuts to education threaten our children’s futures and if we don’t take a stand now then, in a few years’ time council services, as we know them, will cease to exist.
But you’re right, there is much more to a socialist programme than saying we’re against cuts. The Socialist Party wants to see ordinary people freed from spending all their time struggling to make ends meet, which is why we have a programme of demands including raising the minimum wage, reducing the working week and taking the giant companies that dominate our lives into democratic, public ownership – that would include the power and energy companies and utilities and the banks.
Standing in one council election in Swansea might seem a far cry from these ambitious aims bit we are part of a far wider movement and we’re putting down a marker for the future. The Labour Party has given up all rights to be considered a workers’ party with their slavish copying of Tory policies. Their collapse in Scotland is a taste of what’s to come elsewhere in future. Workers desperately need a new mass party of their own; TUSC offers an opportunity to build such a party. Every success, even every vote for TUSC is a step along that road.
Locally, a TUSC councillor would be demanding investment in housing – renovation and building of quality council housing. We would put the case for bringing the services that the Liberals and Labour have both outsourced back in house and planning them for the needs of the local community not to make profit from parasitic private vultures. We would argue for the participation of local people and council workers in improving and expanding services for all our benefit.
Swansea Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) are fighting against cuts and for a real alternative.
Swansea needs councillors who vote against cuts! No to austerity - vote Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC).
Don’t waste the opportunity to send a clear ‘no more cuts’ message by voting for Ronnie Job, TUSC: the only no-cuts, socialist candidate in Swansea West in the 2015 General Election!
Don’t waste the opportunity to send a clear ‘no more cuts’ message by voting for Ronnie Job, TUSC: the only no-cuts, socialist candidate in Swansea West in the 2015 General Election!
Showing posts with label Socialist party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Socialist party. Show all posts
Thursday, 20 November 2014
Thursday, 14 November 2013
How serious was Labour about scrapping the Bedroom Tax?
The news that Swansea's 2 MPs were among 47 Labour MPS who did not vote in the debate on the Bedroom Tax, tabled by their own party, and the suggestion that Labour MPs didn't vote because they were 'paired' with Tory counterparts in a gentlemen's agreement, prompted me to send this letter of protest to local publications and news programmes..
Dear Sir,
I note that Swansea's two
MPs, Geraint Davies and Sian James, were among the 47 Labour MPs who didn't
vote on their party's motion to immediately scrap the Bedroom Tax.
I don't know what reasons the
two had for not participating in the vote and it may be they had good reasons
not to be there. Having said that, I would have expected them to have informed
their constituents, in that case, why they could not attend a vote on an issue
that is so crucial to thousands of families in the city, some of them
potentially facing eviction due to not being able to afford to pay bedroom tax.
A number of acquaintances
have suggested that maybe they were 'paired' with Tory MPs and indeed, Labour
Party whips have put out a statement to the effect that this was the reason why
many of the 47 Labour MPs weren't present.
For anybody who is not
familiar with the concept of 'pairing', this is the parliamentary guide:
http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/pairing/
Pairing allows MPs from
opposite parties to enter into an agreement that if one can't attend a debate,
the other also agrees not to attend. There are a couple of important points to
be made here.
1) This is not a
parliamentary rule but a voluntary agreement.
2) Pairing is not used for
important political issues.
Labour's decision to pair so
many of their MPs on this issue suggests that this debate was more about
posturing in the opening shots of what promises to be an 18-month election
campaign rather than a serious attempt to end the misery caused by the bedroom
tax.
It seems that Labour prefers
so-called gentlemen's agreements with a Con-Dem government of millionaires than
fighting for poor constituents, who seem to be little more than voting fodder
to them. The bedroom tax may not be a serious political issue for Labour MPs
who agree to be 'paired' but it is extremely serious for tenants who can't
afford it, potentially facing eviction.
It reinforces the feeling
that parliament is a club, with obscure rules most of us don't understand, the
main purpose of which is to provide MPs with a gravy train to ride.
If Labour wants to convince
us they are serious about getting rid of the bedroom tax then they should
immediately instruct all Labour councils to stop harassing and even threatening
with eviction, people who can't afford to pay bedroom tax.
I am a member of the
Socialist Party which believes that elected representatives should have the
same income as the people they represent. We call for MPs to commit to being 'a
workers' MP on a worker's wage'. We don't believe in entering into gentlemen's
agreements with people that have caused so much misery for working class
communities. And we demand an immediate 'no evictions' commitment for bedroom
tax non-payers.
Labour MPs who didn't vote in
the bedroom tax may just have put themselves at the head of the list for an
electoral challenge by Trades Unionist and Socialist Coalition (which the
Socialist Party is a constituent part of) candidates at the general election.
Ronnie Job, previous and
potential Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) candidate in Swansea
Labels:
Bedroom Tax,
election,
Labour,
no show,
Socialist party,
TUSC
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)